Relationships and Human Behavior Perspectives Essay

Reviewing compassionate styles from different steads, including the five main perspectives of biological, watching, social and ethnic, cognitive, and psychodynamic influences, can or sotimes shed light on why military individualnel act the way they do. Using these perspectives to review how kinships begin, develop, and atomic number 18 maintained can provide a deeper understanding and context of this phenomenon. Framing complete affinitys with these different perspectives also helps to show how the perspectives themselves differ or argon similar in relation to how they consider relationships as being formed and maintained.The biological perspective contends that inhering causes drive homo behavior. Specifically, this perspective states that the actions of the nervous system and genetic heredity lead to different types of behavior (McLeod, 2007). From this perspective, hormonal reactions and feelings of reinforcement in the brain that are associated with a particular indi vidual lead the great unwashed to start relationships (McLeod, 2007). Additionally, the relationship is maintained because gentleman have an natural desire to reproduce and pass their receive genetic material on to their offspring, and in order to drive this urge, the brain continues to trigger feelings of pleasure and hormonal releases to strengthen the companionship between a given person and good feelings (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is mostwhat ludicrous from the other ones in how it views relationships, because it take ins that advanced cognitive processes are not even necessary for a relationship to last instead, only biochemical processes are required.The next type of perspective, the eruditeness perspective, claims that learning through association leads to specific behaviors, and that individuals will generally learn to enact behaviors that they adopt are rewarded (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). From this perspective, humans form relationships because they see othe r relationships, such as those of their parents, externally rewarded, and come to associate the notion of love with reward. The rewards that one receives from a relationship, such as attention, compassion, or even financial security, are associated with love over time, which strengthens the relationship and makes state more presumable tomaintain a relationship after they have been involved in it for almost time (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013).Like the biological perspective, the learning perspective deems relationship behavior as something beyond humans conscious control and does not necessarily require conscious thought, although the learning perspective does not claim to know the internal processes that drive it, and it does require that humans have at least the ability to learn in order for them to be involved in relationships (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013).Social and cultural perspectives claim that humans are ingrained with what constitutes right behavior through socialization. Becau se people grow up, in many cases, in households with get hitched with parents, or at least where the parents date other individuals, tiddlerren learn early on that relationships are not only acceptable, but actually desirable (McLeod, 2007). This notion is further reinforced through messages given to the child through the media, their friends and other family members, and most people they come in contact with, all of whom deem love to be one of the highest goals a person can achieve.Individuals therefore seek out relationships in their young years because they have been told that it is a positive objective to strive toward, and they are further reinforced in their views by their partner and others who know them after dating or getting married, which leads the person to continue their relationship (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is un same(p) the learning and biological perspectives in that it does not rely on reflexes or innate drives, but instead requires complex thought, and, moreover, socialization a person living outside of society would likely have no desire to be in a relationship, according to this perspective.The cognitive perspective claims that human thought is what drives all behavior. In this sense, then, humans enter relationships because they see relationships as something that they desire, and which will provide them with some type of enjoyment or reward for seeking out (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). If they find that they do receive some type of benefit from dating a person, they will make the decision to develop the relationship further, learning more about the person and perhaps even getting married, if they believe that they are sufficiently congruous with the other person for therelationship to last and continue to be rewarding (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). This perspective, like the social and cultural perspective, is very reliant on human thought as a driver of relationships, but the cognitive perspective deems relationships an individual choice rather than a result of societal pressure.Lastly, the psychodynamic perspective contends that behavior is repayable to interactions between the conscious and the subconscious mind. A relationship might begin because a member of the black eye sex might remind an individual of the loving relationship they had with their parents, but in order to sublimate the inappropriate desire for ones parents, the individual seeks out a relationship with a person outside of their family. The relationship is maintained because it provides the person with ego fulfillment (McLeod, 2007).Like the cognitive and social perspectives, the psychodynamic perspective describes relationships in terms of human thought and cognitive activity, but unlike those other perspectives, the psychodynamic outlook believes that humans are essentially bound to enter into relationships, because it ascribes the behavior to innate drives. In this sense, the psychodynamic perspective is somewhat like the biological perspective. All of these different perspectives, then, can provide different types of insight into human relationships.ReferencesMcLeod, S. (2007). Psychology Perspectives. Retrieved from http//www.simplypsychology.org/ Mikkelson, A. C., & Pauley, P. M. (2013). maximise Relationship Possibilities Relational Maximization in Romantic Relationships. Journal Of Social Psychology, 153(4), 467-485. doi10.1080/00224545.2013.767776